Guidance on Marking Assessments in UNDERGRADUATE AND.
All the following tables are calculated using April 2017 National Insurance. They are in the form of web pages and Excel 5 worksheets. If you have any queries regarding access or interpretation of these tables please contact Ann Hastings, HR Operations Manager.The aim of employing this marking scale is to improvethe accuracy, reliability and transparency of the academic judgement of assessments where the difference between each point on the markingscale can be meaningfully evaluated and described using this restricted percentage scale, as opposed to the Type A scale where differences between each.The Common Grading Scale comprises 23 alphanumeric grades grouped into seven bands with an associated grade point for each grade. These grade points are used to: These grade points are used to: i.
The University of Queensland uses a different scale which precludes it from the national table above. Currently, Glasgow uses a unique conversion table for each of its Australian partners, notably with varying cut off points for failing grades (see QUT 7-point scale). Generally, Glasgow is more lenient particularly in.Marking, grading and giving feedback Introduction This set of materials is intended to provide guidance and support for those who are new to assessing and giving feedback and who are asked to implement an existing assessment process. The emphasis here is to provide practical help in doing the.
A first equates to the student having an average of over 70%. An upper second (2:1) is between 60% and 69%. A lower second (2:2) is between 50% and 59%. A third is between 40% and 49%. Although the third can vary depending on what the university pass mark is.
